|
Post by Jeffie Chen on Dec 24, 2009 13:54:19 GMT -5
I don't expect this next part to really take off, yet, since many people are gone visiting family, but whenever the jurors are ready to begin asking their questions, they may post them here.
You do not have to wait for the finalists to finish answering questions by other jurors before you ask your question and there is no set order for you to ask your questions in.
|
|
|
Post by Anthony (C2M) on Dec 27, 2009 12:47:47 GMT -5
Congrats to both of you on making it to the end. I have some questions for both of you. Please put effort into these and not just blow them off because as of right now I am undecided. They say people can either vote from their head or their heart and right now I can vote besed on both so answer these questions to the fullest.
To both: Name and EXPLAIN one (or more if you like) flaw in your opponents gameplay. (Please dont say, oh, well they played a good game I have nothing bad to say) answer the question as it is asked please.
Nathan: I dont play the past game hate game, but it seemed as if you (and Warren) did against me. I told you I was not after you in the early points of this game but you and Warren kept nominating me. I didnt give you any reason to not trust me, so why did you not trust me?
Erin: In the begining of this game we spoke and made a deal to go to the final 2. That was when the cast was released and we started to talk and see who we wanted in and who we wanted to take out, but throughout this game you said we never had that deal. Is it my fault for thinking you would remember, or should I have saved the convo to show you later? You know I like talking to you and we are friends, but did you honestly forget or think that since Nathan is stronger so go with him instead of me?
Right now if I vote with my head, Nathan has the vote for the best game in my eyes, but if I choose to vote with my heart then right now Erin would get my vote because we have a friendship and I tried with Nathan but that didnt work.
These answers will help me decide and maybe I will vote with my head and heart as one and award the person who shows why they played the game the best with my vote because in the end the person who can sell theirself the best gets the votes of the jurors. Good Luck!
|
|
|
Post by Erin Brockovich on Dec 28, 2009 0:17:17 GMT -5
Hey Anthony, nice to see you again, hope you had a good holiday. Thanks for taking the time to respond so soon. I have a feeling it will be a ghost town for a few more days. To both: Name and EXPLAIN one (or more if you like) flaw in your opponent’s game play. (Please don’t say, oh, well they played a good game I have nothing bad to say) answer the question as it is asked please.For me Nathan can do and say no wrong, because he has always been there for me as a friend and ally in games. I am fortunate to always be on his good side. This guy can be the Grinch, an Ogar, and Oscar the Grouch which spells out Cranky Bitch. He is very outspoken and can be so intimidating. If you rub him the wrong way he will jump down your throat, bite your head off and then tell your headless body to get the hell out of town. If he doesn’t like you he will let you know and he is known to cause people to break down in tears. He will lie straight to your face and then turn around and trash you in his confessionals and be proud of it. He has no patience for stupidity and thinks he is all that and will be a bitchy bitch 24/7 because he likes the attention. Erin: In the beginning of this game we spoke and made a deal to go to the final 2. That was when the cast was released and we started to talk and see whom we wanted in and whom we wanted to take out, but throughout this game you said we never had that deal. Is it my fault for thinking you would remember, or should I have saved the convo to show you later? You know I like talking to you and we are friends, but did you honestly forget or think that since Nathan is stronger so go with him instead of me?Anthony, I went with Nathan (chose to work or align with him)not because he was stronger person in the game, but let me explain. I remember you mentioned the subject of an alliance I “so called” committed too. Whether you kept the conversation or not, I wont deny you asking, but I never solidified it. It’s one thing asking or saying you want a deal, but keeping your commitments solidified is what is most important while making a long term deal, especially if it’s a F2 alliance. I knew I had already made other commitments and had already been aligned with a select few and when the game started I was asked for a room alliance with Chad and Quinn. I was committed and most loyal to those alliances because they were solidified. I do apologize if you assumed we were aligned but when you have an alliance you discuss game related stuff and you never did that even in the beginning of the game. It’s a wonder how lately we have managed to get to the end in the last two games but rarely talk or work together. Now let me share with you how I identify a good ally: A good ally is someone that wants to work with their alliance and willing to help it flourish and grow to further you in the game. It takes a big responsibility and commitment because you have to be somewhat a social maniac to accomplish that. You never were social with me, you never came to me to talk game strategy until you were on the block. It is usually me whom came to you and when I did bring up the game your responses were always LOL or OK and had no substance to the conversation. It goes both ways, you need to communicate and you never did in the way a true ally does. I remember when you didn’t have a problem talking about real life stuff but lately for some reason you never want to talk game with me. So next game we play, remember I take whom I am aligning with very serious and believe me, if you are aligned with me, you will know it. So that is why I will always align and work with allies that are personable and are driven to want to help the alliance and have an interest to earn their position in getting to the end. Nathan is someone who has those qualities and he is what I define a good ally and great friend. I can trust and depend on him 100%. Not too many people you can say about that, it's actually a rare commodity to find in online games. I'm not stupid, I know a good thing when I see it. You’re a nice person Anthony and a good friend but it just isn’t in the stars for us to work together. I am too high maintenance and you couldn’t afford me if you wanted too. Anyways, good luck making up your mind, I hope me being honest was what you wanted to hear because I could always use my cuteness and charm. Just remember whether your vote comes from within your head ( . ) ( . ) or your heart <3; know that I will respect whatever the outcome of your decision is.
|
|
Nathan
Member
[M:2]
Posts: 106
|
Post by Nathan on Dec 28, 2009 18:44:50 GMT -5
To both: Name and EXPLAIN one (or more if you like) flaw in your opponents gameplay. (Please dont say, oh, well they played a good game I have nothing bad to say) answer the question as it is asked please.
I think the biggest flaw in Erin's game is that she's a very nice, and she really does have a difficult time with voting people out sometimes. I on the other hand never let my emotions get in the way. If I wanted someone out, I was going to take them out. I genuinely like Thrills, Jessica and Yang as people, but as players, I knew I had to eliminate them if I wanted to get further.
Nathan: I dont play the past game hate game, but it seemed as if you (and Warren) did against me. I told you I was not after you in the early points of this game but you and Warren kept nominating me. I didnt give you any reason to not trust me, so why did you not trust me?
I find it slightly ironic that you say you don't hold anything over from past games, and in the same breath you lump me and Warren together as if we were one person. Warren and I became good friends last season, but this season he was out so early that I don't think it's fair to say that what I did was attributed too much to him, or vise versa.
I'm also puzzled by your assertion that I “kept nominating you”. I put you on the block twice in this game, and one of those times was because my only other option would have been Erin. Not only that, but I personally kept you in the game on more than one occasion (once when you were up against Jessica and I broke the tie in your favor, and again at final four when I gave you the veto instead of Yang).
If you feel like I didn't trust you – you're right. I didn't. But we never really had an alliance, so I don't know why I should be expected to trust you. Quite frankly, I didn't trust anyone in this game except for Erin and Warren. But - if you really feel like I was after you throughout the game, that is based on your own perceptions and not my actual actions. I wasn't after you any more than I was after anyone else. In fact, you were very low on my hit list. There are at least five other people who I was targeting more.
I understand that you are conflicted about how to vote, but you said yourself that you think I played the better game. If you choose to vote based on other criteria, that's up to you. But I would certainly hope that you could prove yourself “All Star” worthy by putting aside any ill feelings you have towards me, and voting simply based on who you think played best.
Nathan
|
|
|
Post by Heather on Dec 29, 2009 12:23:48 GMT -5
Hi guys, I haven't seen you guys in a while, so my vote is totally up for grabs right now My question is simple. What would you do with the prize money if this was the real Big Brother? Thank you both in advance
|
|
Nathan
Member
[M:2]
Posts: 106
|
Post by Nathan on Dec 29, 2009 13:44:01 GMT -5
Hi guys, I haven't seen you guys in a while, so my vote is totally up for grabs right now My question is simple. What would you do with the prize money if this was the real Big Brother? Thank you both in advance Hi Heather. There are three things that immediately come to mind: 1. I would throw a party or take a vacation with my friends since I would miss them all terribly after being cooped up in the house, and I'd want to do something nice for them. 2. I'd put a down payment on a condo, since I've wanted to be a homeowner for a while now. 3. I would donate a portion to HIV & AIDS research, since that is what I do for a living and it is my biggest passion in life. Thanks!
|
|
|
Post by Erin Brockovich on Dec 29, 2009 19:54:22 GMT -5
Thanks Heather for coming back and asking a fun question, something that is definitely obsolete in these games and that is the MONEY that comes with getting to the end of these games.
What would you do with the prize money if this was the real Big Brother?
After the IRS takes his part....I am not like Richard Hatch....ha ha. I would take the rest and help my parents out and pay off all their debt. I would put some away some for my kids college fund and go on just one shopping spree ;D
The rest of the money I would donate to a few charities. There’s a foundation I donate to yearly and it's called Vasa Previa. It’s a foundation that researches what causes fetal vessels to burst in the umbilical cord. If it isn’t caught in time it can lead to fetal death. I make the donations on a regular basis and I hope someday they will find a cure. The other charity of my choice would also have to involve children. I would like to donate the rest of my money to Make a Wish Foundation and give a child a dream come true. Nothing better then seeing a smile on a child's face.
Thanks again and good luck on your decision.
|
|
|
Post by yang on Dec 29, 2009 22:03:43 GMT -5
Greetings, it is Yang who has returned to pay you 2 a little visit. Aren't you excited? Yang knows you are...*grins*.
Anyways, it is no secret that Yang came into questioning thinking Nathan outplayed Erin, but if Erin is able to prove otherwise, then the vote is hers.
That being said, Yang probably played a dirtier game than anyone else involved in it. He did vote Warren out as all of you should vote by now, but this was not the one mistake he commonly referred to. His one mistake would be when he voted 5 minutes late because he was going to save Quinn with his vote since Quinn was the only person at that point that Yang could trust to go to finals with. Then of course he would have blamed Quinn staying on Heather just like he blamed the Warren incident on Chad.
Why is Yang wasting time telling you these things? Because Yang is just showing examples of his dirty play....and THAT is what Yang wants to see from the two of you to get his vote.
First a trivial question for Erin....Nathan was man enough to admit that the week Warren won HOH you all held a meeting and didn't include Yang. He was also man enough to admit that you had all started going behind Yang's back in the time prior to this thinking he had already flipped (which he hadn't and this sneaky play is what caused Yang to flip).
So simply...before the entire house Yang will ask you one last time...do you still deny that this was going on? Or will you finally man up as Nathan has done?
Just to keep things fair, Yang will ask Nathan a trivial question as well....final 3 rolls along and its you, Warren, and Erin...you win HOH...do you take Warren or Erin? No explanation needed because Yang is only asking this to keep things balanced, he doesn't care about the answer much.
Also one more thing for Erin...in your first answer to Anthony, you were instructed to talk about a flaw in Nathan's game....except when Yang read it, it simply seemed like you were vouching for his game. What exactly was his flaw? You didn't state it very well as far as Yang can see. Yang doesn't think Nathan's answer to that question was that strong, but he atleast stated the flaw plain as day.
Now for the main thing Yang will base his vote on....which of you played the dirtier game?
That is the primary criteria Yang will base things on.
So To Both: Tell Yang what you did that was dirty, why it was dirty, and why it was dirtier than what your opponent did.
Include anything you wish in this answer
That is all, Yang *grins*
|
|
Nathan
Member
[M:2]
Posts: 106
|
Post by Nathan on Dec 29, 2009 23:12:59 GMT -5
Just to keep things fair, Yang will ask Nathan a trivial question as well....final 3 rolls along and its you, Warren, and Erin...you win HOH...do you take Warren or Erin? No explanation needed because Yang is only asking this to keep things balanced, he doesn't care about the answer much.
That's a tough question, and one that I never thought too much about because I sort of always knew that the three of us would never get to the end together. Frankly, I'm shocked you morons allowed even two of us to stick together throughout the whole game. So the answer is – I don't know what I would have done. It's a decision I'm glad I didn't have to make, and one that I'm not going to make now just for the sake of a “trivial question” that you don't care about the answer to anyway.
So To Both: Tell Yang what you did that was dirty, why it was dirty, and why it was dirtier than what your opponent did.
Um, duh of course I played a dirtier game than Erin. I'm a bitch, dearie. I made some pretty dirty moves at almost everyone's expense:
After I nominated Dick I made up a bunch of lies regarding what others were saying about him behind his back. This caused him to completely self destruct and ultimately quit the game like a big loser.
I made an alliance with Chad after that to secure that he didn't put me up that week. I made a phony alliance with Will even though I was TOTALLY working to get him evicted. Then I got Chad to nominate Will, because I really wanted him out – and then after all my work to get Will nominated, Yang wasn't going to evict him, and we needed his vote. So we made up a story about Will coming after Yang (which Kathleen sort of alluded to), and got Yang to switch his vote, causing Will to leave, and Yang to take out Kathleen the very next round. Two birds, one lie.
The week Thrills left was obviously a pretty nasty week. Yang was going nuts trying to win HOH and I was not about to have that because I thought he would be an idiot to not put me up if he won. So we started a discussion with Thrills/Jessica that was fueled by us not trusting Yang – and I devised a plan to get the coins distributed so that Warren would win with the agreement that Heather & Anthony would go up - with Quinn as a backup nominee (which I knew would NEVER happen because we were heavily aligned with Quinn).
After Warren left, Thrills won HOH – he rightfully put Erin and I on the block together, and when he chose to put Chad up as a veto replacement, I had to make sure that people made a dumb mistake (meaning keep me in the game). I had to really pretend that I believed Yang's crap about Chad voting Warren out. I ALWAYS knew that it was Yang (Thrills even confirmed it after it happened), but I knew that if Yang thought that I was stupid enough to trust him, that he would work hard to get Chad evicted because he could then pretend like he controlled the whole situation with his “brilliant” lie - which - sorry Yang, but no one believed. I was the one who controlled things in this game, not you. Hehe.
Jessica then won HOH and I figured she would probably be smart enough to put me and Erin up together – so I started a conversation with her where I layed everything out, earned her trust, promised up and down to not put her on the block, and convinced her to put Quinn up instead. Then I won veto, saved Erin, and the two of us remained safe again. To me, Jessica not putting us both on the block was probably the biggest mistake in the game. Convincing her to do this, was pretty dirty – especially since I promptly broke my promise to her when I put her on the block the very next week.
At final four, I also let Anthony believe that he changed my mind from him to Yang, in return for him promising to keep me at final 3 in the (unlikely) chance that he won the final HOH. That way I guaranteed myself final 2 no matter who won the last HOH.
Oh and Yang, let's not forget how I kept pretending to be your friend and trust you even though I was VERY anxious to evict you. If you hadn't kept winning veto, I would have taken you out before Jessica and Heather as well. The only person I wanted out more than you was Thrills. So yeah.... I had no qualms about playing dirty in this game. And I did it unapologetically, which some people might consider pretty dirty in and of itself. I just think that if people don't expect to get lied to when they sign up for these games, they are stupid – in which case I don't care if they hate me.
Thanks, Yang. Hope that answers your question.
|
|
|
Post by Erin Brockovich on Dec 31, 2009 12:24:58 GMT -5
Everytime I think, what is a Yang, I get this image in my head. *holds up glass of wine and makes a toast to Nathans roast to Yang* Yang lets get one thing straight, I am not in House of evil nor Depths of Hell, I am playing the character of Erin and if I want to be a sappy bitch in my answers then so be it. You can take your ego and shove it where the sun don’t shine. I was truthful with my answer, and if you really want to know I cant find any flaws with Nathan. I see no flaws; therefore I just went on about the flaw others may see in him. If Anthony has a problem with my answer then let him act on it and stay out of it, it’s none of your business. Now if you asked me to list your flaws, let me have at it man, I will fill up 7 pages. LMAO. BTW the round we met in chat, that round you knew how much Thrills was a threat to me, Warren and Nathan. You were so sure you had everyone in your pocket. Infact you knew how much I wanted Thrills out and you went over and above and made this elaborate plan and we weren’t going for it. That was when I entered the chat with Jess and Thrills and I had a feeling you had known something was going on because you made no big deal but I knew you were pissed even thinking we did anything behind your back. As I recall I told Thrills and Jessica that you wanted to control that round, that is why me, Nathan and Warren made deals to agree we would all be safe if any of us won HOH. Your name was never mentioned as a target. But after that round is when you started to distance yourself and act like all shady. It was you that was not communicating with us, your so-called F4 alliance. I would PM you or try to talk and you wouldn’t have the balls to respond, because you knew I knew you were playing both sides. We only heard from you when you won something and or you were in danger. All you do is brag and your demeanor in the game royally sucks. Don’t you wonder why you don’t get past F3 in games? No love for Yang and now I learned why. I just want you to know when we started the game; I genuinely wanted to work with you. I knew Warren and Nathan were creeped out by your stupid cowardly way of how you hide behind this evil Yang character. But at least I gave you the benefit of the doubt, even though I know how your Yang character is a lying piece of crap and uses and abuses his allies. I am not stupid and when I heard of “our” alliance being talked about, I knew first hand who was flapping his lips. How else would people think we are all together? You are the biggest egotistical lying shady mo fo in the game of orgs, but Dr. Will is better . You always think you have everyone in the palm of your hand and it’s your way or the highway. Your only looking out what benefits you and I was not going to get tangled in your web and deal with your stubbornness. I didn’t get to make many dirty moves first hand, because it always was Nathan winning the rounds and breaking the ties (which you caused every round). Nathan and me did work very close with all the challenges and sometimes we would sacrifice a win for each other. So I wasn’t the actual one casting the three tie votes that eliminated you, Thrills and Jessica, but if I was the HOH that round, I would of done the deed. I just know that Nathan gets much more pleasure being the bitch in our alliance and he wanted to evict them as much as I did but face it, he is better at it. The dirtiest move I made in this game was aligning with Yang, he is a filthy liar and an egotistical control freak. I was proud not to trust you and succumb to your evil desperate ploys. One good move I made, while playing Erin a “good” character, or did you forget that? I'm like a bottle of fine wine, I get better with time and I believed in my intuition about you and I don't nor ever did like your Yang character. I think it's creepy and freaky and your evil tactics no longer intimidate me. Now I already know you made your mind up before you even asked us anything and I’m giving it my best to compete against “Dirty Nathan” but I wont deny he was totally a bitch and he did get to make the big bad and bold moves in the game. I agree with Nathan, we totally controlled the game and it was all of your stupidity that you couldn’t defeat us. Either way, even if I don’t take home the title, I won regardless. Thanks; hope that answered your question.
|
|
|
Post by DoctorThrills on Jan 2, 2010 0:13:54 GMT -5
Hey Erin & Nathan.. congrats on finals.
This really was all too predictable, but I do give you both credit - it's truly a shame that in an all-stars season we had some individuals winning more challenges and stirring the pot than like 3-4 others combined. Before I even get to questions, let me get a few things straight. I had a target pinned on me early on, and honestly the ONLY person I had an alliance with was Yang who, unbeknownst to me, was already fucking me over behind my back from the git-go. Ironically enough, he put me here at the F7 as well. I tried to get with you two, and was completely genuine, but neither of you could trust me and I was forced to turn to new allies like Jessica. Had I won HOH in round two, I actually was planning to put her up.
Erin - with you, as usual, I felt an overwhelming amount of ingenuity and shallowness throughout the entire game. The excuses you gave me for targeting me specifically ring a bell.
Too strong and invincible. For starters, how about you go back and look at those amazingly difficult POV competitions I won. I do have to admit, it was a bloody death match against Kathleen in one of them. Counting sticks is amazingly difficult, too. If you're going to vote me out because I can win a challenge, don't sugarcode it. I don't need to hear that I'm invincible. I was simply one in a pool of 2-3 people who gave a rats ass to win the POV that early in the game and anyone should be able to see that. What's even worse than that is your misperception of the amount of allies and votes I was capable of pulling off. No votes, huh? Your vote wouldn't matter anyways? As a matter of fact, had you flipped, I would have not been evicted that round. The amount of arrogance you showed me that round completely turned me off and I will have a damn hard time voting for you.
On top of that, I don't feel like you really even emerged in the game until far down the road. I realize that no one man calls the shots, but in this case, you definitely appeared to be the Becky of an Ozzy-Yul-Becky alliance, with Warren and Nathan being the two dominating males of the alliance. Now, this can work for or against you, but my major problem is realizing whether you gave this game as much effort as Nathan. Had it been my choice, I would have cut Nathan out anytime before you simply because he jumped out in the line of fire so many times throughout the game and I firmly believed I could beat you in a challenge and win against you far easier than I could him.
Nathan - I really don't have much to say to you. You didn't really help me out much, you didn't really hurt me much. I'd say our relationship in the game pretty much remained static through out.
Now for a few questions to both of you -
You two and your "clan" definitely dominated the game in all aspects at the beginning. I do however think you guys started to underestimate the other side of the house and, at times, got a little bit too comfortable with where you sat.. which ultimately led to the back-to-back evictions of Warren, Chad, and Quinn. Would you agree with this?
How did you both play differently and similarly to your first games? Do you feel you played better or worse, and why?
Finally, list each player in this game in the order you perceived them as threats and explain your reasonings why thoroughly.
Thanks.
|
|
|
Post by Heather on Jan 2, 2010 15:06:25 GMT -5
Thank you both for your answers, and good luck
|
|
|
Post by quinn on Jan 3, 2010 21:56:01 GMT -5
Question for Erin.
Was Nate your final2 partner all game long?
Answer truthfully, no cop outs.....
|
|
|
Post by Erin Brockovich on Jan 4, 2010 11:51:22 GMT -5
Hey Thrills, thanks for coming back and sorry for taking so long on your answer. I do apologize for some of my actions in the game. I did try to be honest with you and I wanted to trust you, but I did make promises to people before you hit me up for any kind of an alliance. I always knew in the back of my head that you would eventually target me, Nathan and Warren because you knew how close I was to them. Yang did play us both and I would of much rather had you then him, but you were always a threat to Warren and Nathan and I was with them first. I should have FLIPPED? As I recall Thrills, I had a majority of the alliance that wanted to vote you out, that is what I meant by majority of the house. I wasn’t being arrogant just because I was sure our alliance had the votes to evict you. I knew if I had flipped my allies would be upset, because from day one, you were the one they all wanted out. Nothing personal Thrills, but you were a threat to me and my alliance in this game not only because you were good at surviving, but I knew you would come after Nathan and Warren and eventually break us up. It was Warren's decision to replace you with Anthony and I wasn’t about to go against my alliance to side with you. There is nothing wrong with how “Becky” played in Cooks and I am proud to be compared to her. I actually liked how she played the game. I have no regrets how I played Thrills or the alliances I chose to be apart of. What you don’t know is I was just as dominating in my alliance as Warren and Nathan, we all compliment each other in many ways. I wont deny, there younger, more vibrant and a lot quicker in challenges and strategy, but I can be dominating in other ways. I agree with you, you can easily win against me over Nathan, but that doesn’t mean I don’t contribute and help my alliance. I have always put myself in the line of fire for my alliance and will do anything for them. In this game I tried to play a little different and not go balls out on challenges, but that doesn’t mean I didn’t try. I had good people to work with and I actually had people looking out for me in this game so I didn’t have to win all the time. You two and your "clan" definitely dominated the game in all aspects at the beginning. I do however think you guys started to underestimate the other side of the house and, at times, got a little bit too comfortable with where you sat.. which ultimately led to the back-to-back evictions of Warren, Chad, and Quinn. Would you agree with this? I absolutely agree to an extent, our clan did have control and dominated but it wasn’t always that easy. Even though I felt I was always in a good position I wasn’t always confident nor did I get cocky. I always knew any twist could halt my plans. (Thrills returning). I never underestimated the power Thrills has over people and how good of a negotiator he is. How did you both play differently and similarly to your first games? Do you feel you played better or worse, and why?I believe of all the games I have played, including AS, this is the one I played the most rounded game. I was true to my core alliance. I had a couple deals that I wanted to uphold, and I wasn’t go around making deals with everyone. I played a solid strategic game. You and some of the jurors may not see it that way, because you saw Nathan dominating HOH challenges and having the sole responsibility to breaking a few ties that ultimately 3 evicted players out of the game. I’m aware those moves put himself in the line of fire but I would do the same in his position. My game play is very similar to the last game we played together. We usually go into games with an unspoken alliance. Every game we play we are usually targets, its no secret we are close. The only difference in this game then the rest is we needed to work more diligently because we lost all our trusted allies. I did make a couple more alliances outside my core 3, and had tried not to play the dishonest card but in the process I did make a couple false promises that I knew I couldn’t keep. I tried not to lead people on in this game but we all know that’s not possible if we want to get to the end. I stay focused on the big picture and that was our plan to get to the F2. Of the 4 games we played this is the only time we have reached the F2 together and that makes me proud we accomplished what is sometimes impossible in these games. Since the first game I played with Nathan things have changed as our relationship has grown closer. Our strategies are different but complement one another. Nathan is much sharper then me, he tends to think ahead and be able to see the game in a positive outlook. Nathan gives me encouragement and support and is always there when I need him. We enjoy socializing and we work great together in games. We commit 100% effort into the challenges and our alliance. I came into this game not so confident because everyone knew the two of us are extremely close and came into the game as previous winners of BB4 and BB5. We did play very similar in this game compared to our last, which was BBAHD on SEG. We were dominating the game but we were a huge power to the house and were both being targeted throughout the entire game. I wasn’t able to survive past 5th and Nathan went on to win the game. Every game we have played; there was a pattern. If I came in 5th, Nathan would win and vice versa. This has happened 3 games in a row this being the one that broke the curse. ;D Finally, list each player in this game in the order you perceived him or her as threats and explain your reasoning why thoroughly.Thrills – we have an unusal relationship and in the past games we played, when we are on the same side we usually work good together. I recall even going to F2 together and both winning. Thrills is a very loyal ally and when makes a deal or promise he usually will uphold it. He is very strong in challenges and is an absolute genius in strategizing. He is a huge threat in every aspect in the game and has great skills in negotiating his way with people and can easily stir the pot and switch it up. Yang – now I got a false impression with Yang playing out his character. Yang hosted Erin’s BB4 game and this is my first time playing against him, he just creeps me out. I don’t like the character he plays or the strategy of his game play. I actually think Yang is a huge threat in games because he usually gets close to the finals. He is a terrible liar and has a huge ego. That irritates me and turns me off to ever wanting to work with him in future games. Dr. Will – this guy has a unique way of how he plays. He is smart, a good liar and one of the best strategist I have been betrayed by. Dr. Will is a threat in every game whether he is active or not but a dangerous player because he can play a great UTR game and get away with it. I am sometimes naïve enough to fall into his web of lies and deceptions, so that is why he is my usual target in games. Gotta love him though. Evil Dick – she plays a lot of games and can be a powerhouse in challenges. She isn’t so much into socializing but she does get far in games, so she must be doing something right. Cyber and I have never been on the same side, recently she has has been taking the games very personal. I was extremely disappointed in her reason to quit the game so early. Chad - proved to be an early threat in the game and out of the people from my alliance. He is a very competitive player and quick in the challenges, he isn't much of a social threat but he can talk game. Ant – he usually gets far in games, but that is because no one sees him as a threat. He tends to be quite and reserved. He isn’t the best in the communication department but at least he talks to me. Had Ant had the time to put an effort into a game he can be a great player. Barinade – another person I don’t usually play with. I don’t see Eric as a threat because he isn’t very competitive in games but when he put’s his mind too it, he can do well in challenges. He isn’t very good in the social aspect of this game, or at least he never comes to me, I always have to bring the game talk to him. Heather – I know Heather is a sweet girl, but she is another person that signs up for games and puts not an ounce of effort in them. She is just there and is usually dragged to the end of games because people don’t see her as a social nor physical threat. Jessica – at first when I met Jason he was a huge threat to me, socially and competitively. Usually, I would have good things to say about his creativeness and good strategy, those were all the qualities he has when he puts an effort into the games he plays. But lets face it; this guy has left the org planet long time ago. He obviously has no time for these games and I have no patience for people like that. Most of us play these games as a hobby and we all take different approaches on how we play, others take it more serious to at least commit to the game to the end. I have nothing more to say about Jason other then he needs to focus on his full time job and quit signing up for games he cannot commit too. He’s reputation as a good player has been tarnished in my eyes and you will never see me play for him or with him because he just doesn’t have what it takes anymore. Quinn – another player that can be a threat if he was more committed to the games he plays. He is a good ally and someone that can be loyal as well. He does well socializing; he is very funny and likable and can be a good strategist when he puts forth the effort. Warren – me and Warren go way back but haven't played a game in a very long time. He is quite and some what reserved. He isn’t the most social and people don’t see him as a threat but he is sharp and knows how to strategize. He is a loyal ally and puts an effort into protecting his alliance. Nathan – he was a social and physical threat and the force in the game and without him I would not be here. He can be a social threat, yet be the biggest bitch if he doesn’t like you. He is a great strategist and can persuade anyone to believe him. He is a kick ass competitor and good and trusting ally. Thanks Thrills, sorry for being so long, hope it's what you were looking for. Good luck on your decision. reajusted my threat list, because Erin wasn't thinking from her perspective and thinking of how threatening they are in games
|
|
|
Post by Erin Brockovich on Jan 4, 2010 12:10:46 GMT -5
Question for Erin. Was Nate your final2 partner all game long? Answer truthfully, no cop outs..... Hi Quinn, so nice to see you again...btw, I found a pair of boxers, a box of kleenex, and a picture of Jeffie Chen hidden under our bed, was that yours or Chads? So we ended up in the same room with Chad and we made an alliance. Then you came to me and wanted to make a F2 when I knew I already had unspoken alliance with Nathan and I was sure I would work with Warren as well. You knew that all of us were pretty much all working together in the first couple weeks. The day I made a F2 with you, which was the first one I made, other then my unspoken one with Nathan. I had no intentions of breaking that at the time, it was still early in the game and I was SURE me and Nathan would never outlast you. I know you must of assumed I was tight with Nathan and knew that I could break our F2. You left before that happened and had there been some miracle it was us three in the end and it was my choice, yes I would of evicted you, only because it was a goal of ours for sometime to get to F2. If Nathan left before you, you would of definitely seen the loyalty I promised you. No cop outs for Erin, I answered your question honesty and I know it won't make you any more pleased with me, but I hope it was my honesty that was what you looking for in my answer. Good luck with your decision.
|
|